Legal Opinion
RSI Roofing, Inc. v. Hartnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 27, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Labor Law §§ 220 and 220-b) to review a determination of respondent which, inter alia, found that petitioner failed to pay prevailing wages and wage supplements.
In May 1988 the State University Construction Fund entered into a contract with petitioner for the replacement of the roof on Maxcy Hall at the State University of New York at Potsdam in St. Lawrence County. The Department of Labor issued a prevailing wage schedule for the project containing wage and supplement rates for a variety of trades, including roofer,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Mid Hudson Pam Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kelly v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- General Electric Co. v. New York State Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Naftilos Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agency Construction Corp. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Consolidated Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. AngelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Emes Heating & Plumbing Contractors, Inc. v. McGowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Nelson's Lamp Lighters, Inc. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- TPK Construction Corp. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994