Mid Hudson Pam Corp. v. Hartnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWeiss, J.
Proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Labor Law §§ 220, 220-b) to review two determinations of respondent Commissioner of Labor which ordered petitioners to pay back wages and civil fines and prohibited petitioners from bidding on future public works projects.
In one proceeding petitioners, Mid Hudson Pam Corporation as general contractor and Whitaft Corporation as a subcontractor, seek review of an April 19, 1988 determination of respondent Commissioner of Labor which found that Whitaft, as a subcontractor, had willfully failed to pay the required rate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Collins v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Austin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ramos v. SIMPLEXGRINNELL LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- D & D Mason Contractors, Inc. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hy-Tech Coatings v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- L & M Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Naftilos Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.