Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Beame
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1965PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
The petitioners, laborers employed by the City of New York, have duly filed verified complaints pursuant to the Labor Law (§ 220, subd. 7), in order to have their wages fixed by the fiscal officer (the Comptroller), according to the prevailing rate of wages. Five groups of petitioners sought the same relief and all the proceedings were consolidated by order of the Supreme Court, New York County.
After a hearing before the Comptroller, he determined that the laborers should be subclassified into the following groups:
*107“ Group ‘ A ’ Laborers (duties and responsibilities)
“To do common laboring work…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Flannery v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Watson v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of Hoof v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lantry v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- General Electric Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Nash v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Otis Eastern Service, Inc. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tenalp Construction Corp. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.