Legal Opinion
Denzer v. Frisch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 18, 1988No. C7-88-871PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appeal is taken from an award of summary judgment wherein the trial court found appellants Denzer collaterally estopped from bringing suit against respondents Frisch. Appellants entered a Pi-erringer agreement with the plaintiff in a prior action which had been brought against both appellants and respondents. When appellants subsequently sued respondents for damages, the trial court found appellants had been in privity with the plaintiff during the former action and collaterally estopped appellants’ present action. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
Wayne L. Denzer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Brunsoman v. SeltzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sondel v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Alumax Mill Products, Inc. v. Congress Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- State v. VictorsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Houlihan v. FimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Sondel v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.