Jazbinsek v. Chang
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
Defendants Shu Jen Chang and Chen Tu Ou (Chang/Ou) appeal the judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Raymond Jazbinsek (Jazbinsek) after a jury found them to be 35 percent causally negligent for his injuries. 1 The Honorable Livingston M. Johnson molded the verdict of $72,000.00 to reflect the proportionate liability of the defendants. Upon Jazbinsek’s request, Judge Johnson also assessed delay damages according to the proportionate liability of the defendants and Rule 238 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, 42 Pa.C.S. (Purdon 1987 & Supp.1991). We reverse.
This case…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Tindal v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Brodsky v. Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kennel v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Frey v. Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Sun Pipe Line Co. v. Tri-State Telecommunications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Miller v. HellmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Karpieniak v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.