Karpieniak v. Lowe
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, Barry and Kathleen Lowe and Dawn Lowe Whitney, appeal from a Supplemental Decree entered May 7, 1998, in this equity action. We reverse.
¶ 2 The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court had the power to enter the Supplemental Decree, which substantially altered its original decree, to create an easement across Appellants’ property when no such relief was requested either in the complaint or at trial and no easement was included in the court’s original decree.
¶ 3 A detailed recitation of the facts and procedural history is necessary to understand…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Lower Frederick Township v. ClemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Vanleer v. LernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Township of Ridley v. Ridley Arms, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ridley Arms, Inc. v. Township of RidleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anchel v. SheaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Kline, B. v. Travelers Personal Security Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Kline, B. v. Travelers Personal Security Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Halsey, W. v. Swingle, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Linde, B. v. Linde, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.