Stemland v. C. I. T. Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an adverse judgment entered notwithstanding the verdict in their favor.
Plaintiffs, father and son, bought an automobile under a conditional sale contract. The seller assigned its interest to defendant, a finance corporation, which now stands in the shoes of the seller. The car ivas in possession of the son. Early in January, 1931, there ivas a default in payments, and defendant repossessed the car and sold it for $75. In the early part of February, 1931, defendant’s Chicago lawyer, apparently not knowing that the property had been repossessed, wrote the father that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- A. F. Chase & Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Holmes v. SchnedlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Penchoff v. Walter E. Heller Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- C. I. T. Corporation v. CordsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936