Legal Opinion

Stemland v. C. I. T. Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1932No. 28,991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an adverse judgment entered notwithstanding the verdict in their favor.

Plaintiffs, father and son, bought an automobile under a conditional sale contract. The seller assigned its interest to defendant, a finance corporation, which now stands in the shoes of the seller. The car ivas in possession of the son. Early in January, 1931, there ivas a default in payments, and defendant repossessed the car and sold it for $75. In the early part of February, 1931, defendant’s Chicago lawyer, apparently not knowing that the property had been repossessed, wrote the father that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. F. Chase & Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Holmes v. SchnedlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Penchoff v. Walter E. Heller Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C. I. T. Corporation v. CordsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API