Legal Opinion

Frye & Co. v. Boltman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1935No. 25621. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J. —

This is an action in replevin for the recovery of a team of horses. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury, on an agreed statement' of facts, resulting in a judgment of dismissal. The plaintiff has appealed from that judgment.

It appears that the appellant was the owner and in possession of the horses in question and had them at its stockyards i in Seattle for sale. On November 28, 1933, the defendant Clifford Gray (who was not served and did not appear in the action) appeared, examined the horses^ and expressed a desire to buy at the price named to him. He then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Linn v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Plummer v. KingsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Stohr v. RandleWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Richardson v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Hutson v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API