Legal Opinion

Lombardi v. Wallad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 1, 1923PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.

For the first reason of appeal, the appellant assigns a section of the charge in which the court instructed the jury that the plaintiff could recover only upon the allegations presented in the pleadings, and that those allegations set out first a want of care in the way in which the fire was kindled, and second a want of care in leaving the fire unguarded while it was burning and without taking any precaution to prevent the plaintiff’s intestate from approaching so near to it as to get burned; and the court then stated that there was no evidence in the case which would justify a recovery on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Koelsch v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Lederer v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Duff v. HustedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Kishalaski v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Collins v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Miranti v. Brookside Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API