Legal Opinion
Hemmings v. Weinstein
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1964PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiffs are tenants in the defendants’ apartment building. The named plaintiff, hereafter called the plaintiff, recovered a verdict for damages for personal injuries due to a fall on a walk leading to the entrance to the apartment building and to a later fall in her own apartment. In the verdict, the plaintiff’s husband, the other plaintiff, recovered damages for the resulting medical expenses. The defendants moved to set the verdict aside and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court denied the motions, and from the judgment rendered on the verdict the defendants have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Collins v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Robinson v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Masterson v. AthertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Canfield v. SheketoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gibo v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Pelletier v. BilbilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Phelps v. Consolidated Equities Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Hanauer v. CosciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.