Legal Opinion

State v. Emmons

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1978No. 5635PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherer, P. J.

The 'defendant, appellant herein, was indicted under two counts of receiving stolen property. A jury found him guilty as charged and he was sentenced to the Reformatory.

After being arraigned, the appellant filed a motion requesting the dismissal of the ease on the ground that R. C. 2913.51, under which he was indicted, was void for being vague and that, therefore, it did not state an offense. The pertinent portion of that statute is as follows:

“(A) No person shall receive, retain, or dispose of property of another, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe it has been obtained through…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. State v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. BentzOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. Pesec, 2006-P-0084 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State v. GroverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API