Legal Opinion
State v. Bentz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1981No. C-800335PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
A jury found defendant, Ralph Bentz, guilty of two offenses: receiving or retaining a certain 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais that was owned by Columbia Oldsmobile Co. (Columbia), knowing or having reasonable cause to believe it had been obtained through a theft offense, in violation of R.C. 2913.51(A); 1 and operating that automobile while displaying an Ohio license plate registered to another vehicle, in violation of R.C. 4549.08(C). 2 He was found not guilty of theft. He advances four assignments of error, two of which have merit. The applicable procedural posture or factual background will…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GarrardOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. RedmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. AekinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.