Legal Opinion

Knight v. Hackett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1939No. 34,194PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AlleN, J.:

This was an action against two defendants for damages growing out of an automobile collision. From an order of the court sustaining demurrers to plaintiff’s second amended petition he appeals.

The defendant C. M. Hackett operates a truck as a licensed carrier. The defendant The Travelers Mutual Casualty Company is the insurance carrier for Hackett. The defendant The Fast Refrigerator Lines, Incorporated, is also a licensed carrier, and the defendant The Casualty Reciprocal Exchange is the insurance carrier for that defendant.

In his first cause…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Barzen v. KeplerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Stilwell v. FaithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. In re RockwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Watkins v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lofland v. CromanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Kinderknecht v. HensleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Mead v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Koch v. SuttleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Cale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API