Legal Opinion

Oxford v. Signal Oil & Gas Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1970No. Civ. 1237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARGANO, Acting P. J .

Plaintiffs are the heirs at law of decedents Rex Oxford and Richard Akins. They brought this action against Signal Oil & Gas Company, Howard Chase, Larney Hollick, and others, to recover damages for the wrongful deaths of the decedents, who were killed on February 10, 1967, in the explosion of a “spent caustic tank” belonging to Signal.

Intervener is the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for the Transpacific Company, a company engaged in the business of supplying labor to the oil industry. At the time of death, decedents were in the general employment of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. McFarland v. Voorheis-Trindle Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Johnson v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Housewright v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Santa Cruz Poultry, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Riley v. Southwest Marine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API