Legal Opinion
Gill v. Stella
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1994No. CV 92-3076PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge:
The Plaintiff Pro Se brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his civil rights were violated by the Defendants’ revocation of his parole. The Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) on the grounds that (1) they are shielded from liability by the doctrine of qualified immunity, and (2) the Plaintiff is collaterally estopped from raising his claims in this Court.
BACKGROUND
The Plaintiff, Dalton Gill, was sentenced on July 13,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carrillos v. Incorporated VillageDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Borum v. Village of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Woods v. CandelaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Banks v. PersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Bodkin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.