Legal Opinion

Frankenstein v. Leonard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1938No. 26733PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The plaintiff’s numerous complaints may be outlined by stating that he claims these statutes are in conflict with Sections 1 and 19 of Article I, Sections 1 and 26 of Article II, Section 1 of Article IY, Section 1 of Article XIII, and Section 1 of Article XIX of the Constitution of Ohio; also Sections 8, 9 and 10 of Article I, Section 4 of Article IV, and Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution of the United States; and also Articles Y, XIY and XXI of the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Extended discussion is unnecessary inasmuch as most of the contentions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Harrison v. Wyoming Liquor CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Neil House Hotel Co. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hi Rise, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. City of Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Canton Municipal Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API