Frankenstein v. Leonard
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
The plaintiff’s numerous complaints may be outlined by stating that he claims these statutes are in conflict with Sections 1 and 19 of Article I, Sections 1 and 26 of Article II, Section 1 of Article IY, Section 1 of Article XIII, and Section 1 of Article XIX of the Constitution of Ohio; also Sections 8, 9 and 10 of Article I, Section 4 of Article IV, and Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution of the United States; and also Articles Y, XIY and XXI of the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
Extended discussion is unnecessary inasmuch as most of the contentions…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Harrison v. Wyoming Liquor CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Neil House Hotel Co. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Hi Rise, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Canton Municipal Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.