Legal Opinion

McNutt v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. TC 16-80-10401, CA A21463, SC 28619PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

The principal question presented in this case is whether the breach of a statute outside the Oregon Criminal Code, 1 which breach does not specifically require a culpable mental state, constitutes a misdemeanor or a violation. More specifically, does the breach of ORS 541.615(1), 2 punishable by ORS 541.990(4), 3 constitute a misdemeanor, as described in ORS 161.545 4 and 161.555(3) 5 or a violation, as described in ORS 161.565? 6 The answer to the question lies in the application of the appropriate statutory provisions.

Defendant pleaded guilty in district court to the charge of removal of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Chang Hwan ChoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. Chang Hwan ChoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API