Legal Opinion

State v. Chang Hwan Cho

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. GB 81-48; CA A23284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for offering to purchase the gall bladder of a bear in violation of ORS 498.022. 1 He makes two assignments of error: denial of his motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of res judicata or collateral estoppel, and denial of his motion for directed verdict because of the state’s failure to plead and prove a culpable mental state. Alternatively, defendant argues that, if a culpable mental state is not an element of the offense, then it is a violation and he should be sentenced accordingly. We remand for resentencing.

The first complaint alleged that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McNutt v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Chang Hwan ChoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API