Legal Opinion

Warren v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 30, 2012No. 12-513CPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Hubert Warren, appearing pro se, seeks permission to file a complaint against the United States, along with a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging his state law criminal conviction. He also moves to proceed in forma pauperis. The court permits plaintiffs complaint to be filed for the sole purpose of determining its propriety. However, for the reasons set forth below, the court dismisses plaintiffs complaint as barred by the three-strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). And, assuming that there were no grounds to apply the three-strikes rule, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cycenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Hood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Howell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API