Legal Opinion

Soto v. Progressive Mountain Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2007No. 05CA1032PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HAWTHORNE.

In this case under the former Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (No-Fault Act), plaintiffs, Lorenzo Soto and Veronica Vonderhaar, now known as Veronica Taylor (collectively insureds), appeal the partial summary judgment in favor of defendant, Progressive Mountain Insurance Company. Progressive cross-appeals the trial court's grant of class certification. We dismiss Progressive's cross-appeal, reverse the judgment, and remand the case for further proceedings.

I. Background

In 1999, each insured was involved in an automobile accident while covered under insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Levine v. Empire Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stickley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Murry v. GuideOne Specialty Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Reid v. Geico General InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. In re C.A.B.L.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API