Legal Opinion
Stickley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 10, 2007No. 05-1553PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
Virgil Stickley appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. Background
A. The No-Fault Act
In 1973, the Colorado legislature enacted the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (“CAARA” or “No-Fault Act”) which governed the sale of automobile insurance in the state. 1 See Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 10-4-701 through 726. The purpose of the No-Fault Act was to avoid inadequate compensation to victims of automobile accidents. Brennan v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Bill Barrett Corporation v. YMC Royalty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Adair v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Etherton v. Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.