Legal Opinion

State v. McKenzie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1996No. C3-95-1258PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether the administrative discipline of a prison inmate, including placement in segregation and loss of good time credit, bars criminal prosecution for the same misconduct under the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Appellant Amwati Pepi McKenzie appeals from a district court decision rejecting his argument that the imposition of prison discipline and subsequent criminal prosecution violated his constitutional right not to be punished twice for the same offense. Because we find that the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber. Gene Francis Newby (Appellant in No. 92-5711). Raynaldo Barber (Appellant in No. 92-5712)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. HarlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Jerome Deon Nunn v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Aziz v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. Stone S.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API