Legal Opinion

Aziz v. Fabian

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 2010No. A10-1121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant Shah Quran Ehassan Aziz’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the use by the Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC) of the “some evidence” standard in disciplinary hearings in 2002 and 2004 that resulted in the imposition of 15 additional days of incarceration. We affirm.

FACTS

A disciplinary hearing was held in December 2002 on a charge that appellant violated prison rules by saving a legal document on a hard drive where it was accessible to other inmates. The hearing officer did not state what standard of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maiers v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Ricky James Bedell v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Huseby v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Jerry Duwenhoegger, Sr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API