Legal Opinion
United States v. Mary Helz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1963No. 14771PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DARR, Senior District Judge.
The defendant-appellee, Mary Helz, and her husband executed two notes to a banking institution for the purpose of securing money to improve their home, owned by them as tenants by the entirety. Prior to the making of the loans appellee and her husband executed credit applications on Federal Housing Administration forms, each of which stated that “this application is submitted to obtain credit under the terms of Title I of the National Housing Act.” 48 Stat. 1246, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1703.
The notes were unsecured, the payment being insured by the terms of Title…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Golden Acres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- United States v. Charles E. Carson, Being the Same Person as Charles Edward Carson, and W. R. Ellis, D/B/A Ellis Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Sylacauga Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.