Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cosky v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1999No. C6-99-694Published

1DissentAmundson, Judge

Because I believe that allowing Cosky to use the telephone to make outgoing phone calls did not fully vindicate his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and his statutory right to additional testing, I respectfully dissent. After the Park Nicollet Clinic informed Cosky that it would not send anyone to the jail to perform a blood test, Cosky sought counsel’s advice on how to obtain an additional test. In an implied consent proceeding, the driver’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches when deciding whether to submit to testing and continues through each critical stage, including the right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Dufloth v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API