Legal Opinion

In Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1996No. 18237, 18678PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

In these two appeals, 1 the Department of Human Services (DHS) of the State of Ha- wai‘i appeals from several collateral orders of the family court of the first circuit entered during the course of adjudicating the status of Jane Doe (Minor). On appeal, the DHS contends that the family court: (1) erred in finding that the home of the Minor’s father was not safe; and (2) abused its discretion in awarding DHS temporary legal custody and in making interim orders that, inter alia, directed the DHS to pay foster board payments and other costs related to the care of the Minor.

We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. WallaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jack Endo Electric, Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Troyer v. AdamsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API