In the Interest of Doe
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that a parent’s allegations of a violation of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 through 12134, do not raise a defense in a proceeding to terminate parental rights under Hawai'i Revised Statute (HRS) § 587-73 (1993). However, Department of Human Services-Appellee (DHS) should provide “[e]very reasonable opportunity” to a parent to succeed in reuniting a family, HRS § 587-1 (1993 & Supp. 2001), particularly in establishing the steps necessary to reunite the family in the form of a service plan.1 See HRS 587-26 (1993; Supp.2001).…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Doe v. Division of Youth and Family ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re J.B.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
- Bank of Hawaii v. ShinnHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Elijah C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- TW v. State (In re JW)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- In the Interest of: BP and CS, minor children, NP v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.