Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2002No. 24079PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that a parent’s allegations of a violation of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 through 12134, do not raise a defense in a proceeding to terminate parental rights under Hawai'i Revised Statute (HRS) § 587-73 (1993). However, Department of Human Services-Appellee (DHS) should provide “[e]very reasonable opportunity” to a parent to succeed in reuniting a family, HRS § 587-1 (1993 & Supp. 2001), particularly in establishing the steps necessary to reunite the family in the form of a service plan.1 See HRS 587-26 (1993; Supp.2001).…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Doe v. Division of Youth and Family ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re J.B.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bank of Hawaii v. ShinnHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re Elijah C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. TW v. State (In re JW)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In the Interest of: BP and CS, minor children, NP v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API