Baudanza v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award dismissing a request for hearing on liability for unapproved medical expenses. The justification for this dismissal is the administrative law judge’s conclusion that medical benefits are compensable only if the employer, its carrier, or the Industrial Commission approves the medical treatment before it is provided. Because of this conclusion, the administrative law judge did not address the adequacy of the notice that was provided or reach the merits of the claim. We- set aside the award because…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hopper v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Gullick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Sunstate Equipment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Pickett v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lasiter v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Scottsdale Memorial Hospital v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Ball Mfg. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Chappell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Lasiter v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1992