Sunstate Equipment Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
In this special action review of an Industrial Commission award, one legal issue is presented: whether A.R.S. § 23-1023(C) provides a workers’ compensation carrier with a lien on the employer’s uninsured motorist coverage paid to an employee injured at work. We hold that the statute does not provide the compensation carrier with such a lien and therefore affirm the award.
The parties stipulated to the facts, which we summarize. The respondent employee (employee), while driving his employer’s automobile in the course and scope of his employment, was injured in an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Montedoro v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Allied Mutual Insurance Company v. LarrivaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KarasekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holding v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Travelers Insurance v. BreeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Lou Grubb Chevrolet, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Erie Insurance Co. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Mannel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.