Legal Opinion

Ball Mfg. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 1992No. 1 CA-IC 90-154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*27OPINION

VOSS, Judge

This is a special action review of an industrial commission award for a compensable claim and finding of “special circumstances” justifying liability for medical treatment, including back surgery, despite lack of statutory notice to petitioner employer (Ball). The issues presented on review are: (1) whether respondent employee (claimant) satisfied his burden of medical proof; and, (2) whether petitioner carrier’s (Lumbermen’s) processing of an apparent no time loss claim constituted a “special circumstance” obviating the notice requirement of Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Pascucci v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Gullick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Morrow v. TempleDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API