Legal Opinion

Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 29, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1354PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1.

On this review of an award entered in a workmen’s compensation proceeding, questions are raised by the petitioning self-insured employer relating to (1) whether chiropractic treatment is included within the “medical, surgical and hospital benefits” available to an injured employee under the Arizona Workmen’s Compensation Act; (2) whether an injured employee has the absolute right to choose his own physician, thereby rejecting the medical services and facilities furnished by a self-insured employer pursuant to the provisions of A. R.S. § 23-1070; and, (3)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kleinsmith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Chalupa v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kleinsmith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Estes Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Southwest Gas Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. GreggMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Baudanza v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Lee v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API