Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Fuller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 2001No. CX-99-2061PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In 1999, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility requested that the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board find that probable cause existed for either public discipline or a transfer to disability inactive status for attorney Donald Fuller. A Board panel found probable cause for public discipline, but declined to find probable cause for the transfer to disability inactive status. A petition for disciplinary action was then filed and we referred the matter to a referee for a hearing. The referee recommended that Fuller be suspended indefinitely from the…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SelmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrigsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. BlumKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.