Plaza Esteban v. La Casa Nino, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BABCOCK, Judge.
Defendants, Donald Goldman and Max Baer, and intervenor, La Pompe deVille, Inc., appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff, Plaza Esteban, and its judgment for third-party defendant, Steve Roberts, on their claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. We affirm.
In 1974, plaintiff, as lessor, and defendant La Casa Nino, Inc., as lessee, entered into a ten-year lease of restaurant premises in plaintiff’s shopping center. At that time, defendants Goldman and Baer executed a personal guarantee of lessee’s obligations under the lease. In…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dolton v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Furer v. Allied Steel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Wasalco, Inc. v. El Paso CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jackson v. First National Bank of GreeleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klein v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- MDM Group Associates, Inc. v. CX Reinsurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nobody in Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Klein v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Seidl v. Greentree Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.