Legal Opinion
Smith v. Patterson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
The plaintiff, a taxpayer and citizen of this state, challenges the constitutionality of Chapter 251, General Laws of Oregon of 1929, entitled
“An Act to provide for the management, control, support and operation of the state institutions of higher^ education; to create a state board of higher education; to determine the method of its appointment; to prescribe its powers and duties; and to abolish the board of regents of the University of Oregon, the board of regents of the Oregon State Agricultural college, the board of regents of the Oregon normal schools and the board of higher curricula ;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- David v. Portland Water CommitteeOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- State Ex Rel. Kahn v. TazwellOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Pierce v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Advance Resorts of America, Inc. v. City of WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Kleinsorge v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Gostevskyh v. KaluginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.