Legal Opinion
Aptos Residents Ass'n v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 5, 2018No. H042854PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMihara, J.
*609*1042Appellant Aptos Residents Association (ARA) challenges the superior court's denial of its petition for a writ of mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ( Pub. Resources Code, § 21000, et seq. ). ARA's petition challenged the approval by respondent County of Santa Cruz (the County) of a microcell transmitter project proposed by real party Crown Castle (Crown). Crown's project originally proposed to install 13 microcell transmitters as part of a Distributed Antenna System (DAS). These *1043microcells would be placed on utility poles, primarily in the public right of way,1…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Hines v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berkeley Hills Watershed Coal. v. City of Berkeley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Cal. Construction & Industrial Mat. Assn. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Concerned Citizens of Beverly Hills etc. v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.