State v. Paquette
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice
The State charged Daniel Paquette with online solicitation of a minor under section 33.021(c) of the Texas Penal Code. Pa-quette filed an application for writ of habe-as corpus on grounds that section 33.021 is unconstitutional. The trial court granted Paquette’s application and dismissed the indictment. In a single appellate^ issue, the State contends that the trial court erred by finding the statute unconstitutional and dismissing the indictment. We reverse the trial court’s order granting Paquette’s application for writ of habeas corpus, and we remand…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte Oscar Calvin Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
- April Collins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
3Cited by13 opinions
- EX PARTE Michael Dwain BRADSHAW, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
- Ex parte MoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Armando Salgado v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Dakota Beal v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024
- Ex Parte Derek Ty PoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.