Legal Opinion

EX PARTE Michael Dwain BRADSHAW

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 23, 2016No. 05-16-00570-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Fillmore

Michael Dwain Bradshaw is charged with the offense of online impersonation. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 33.07(a) (West Supp. 2015). 1 Bradshaw filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the constitutionality of section 33.07(a). 2 The trial court denied relief on Bradshaw’s application without conducting a hearing. In three issues, Bradshaw contends section 33.07(a) is facially unconstitutional because it (1) is overbroad in violation of the First Amendment, (2) is too vague to satisfy the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and (3)…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Billy MacK Maddison, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2017
  2. Ex Parte Leonardo Nuncio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
  3. Ex Parte Billy MacK Maddison, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2017
  4. Ex Parte Billy MacK Maddison, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2017
  5. Ex Parte Billy MacK Maddison, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API