Armando Salgado v. State

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice

The State charged Armando Salgado 'with online solicitation of a minor. Salga-do filed an application for writ of habeas corpus, in which he argued that section 33.021(c) of the Texas Penal Code is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague, and violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. The trial court denied Salgado’s application. In three appellate issues, Salgado maintains that section 33.021(c) is unconstitutional. We affirm the trial court’s.order denying Salgado’s application for writ of habeas corpus,

Under section 33.021(c), a person commits the " offense…