Legal Opinion

Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1924No. 4134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAEKER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by the plaintiff in error (herein called the bank) on a bond made to it by the defendant in' error (herein called the bonding company), whereby the latter bound itself to reimburse the bank to the extent of the sum of $5,000 for such pecuniary loss of moneys, securities, or other personal property sustained by the bank by any dishonest act or acts committed by its cashier, C. D. Brigham, in the performance of the duties of said position. It was alleged and proved that during the time covered by the bond Brigham embezzled a large amount of the moneys of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Prosser Power Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montana Auto Finance Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Montana A.F. Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API