Legal Opinion

Montana A.F. Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1929No. 6,444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The act or acts committed by Weekes did not amount to larceny or embezzlement. The bond has been so drafted, skillfully and in the light of the decisions, as to cover only those acts which amount to one of the crimes named, as distinguished from the use of the term "larceny" and "embezzlement" in a broad sense, covering any fraudulent appropriation of the property of the employer, though it may not amount to a crime. (Guarantee Co. v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank T. Co., 100 Fed. 559, 40 C.C.A. 542;Williams v. United States F. G. Co., 105 Md. 490,66 A. 495; Farmers State Bank v. Title Guaranty T.…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Champion Ice Mfg. & Cold Storage Co. v. American Bonding & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williard v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API