Schimke v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The sole issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to order a new trial in the interests of justice because of the physical condition of the jurors.
While it is true as the defendants contend, “[a] juror should, of course, be free from such physical infirmities and mental defects as will interfere with or preclude the proper discharge of his duties” 2 from the record before us, it cannot be said with any degree of certainty that illness affected the deliberations of any of the jurors.
The trial judge in the memorandum opinion on motions after verdict stated:
“The illness…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Stelloh v. LibanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. AmodtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Gray v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Mercury Records Productions, Inc. v. Economic Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- In RE MARRIAGE OF KING v. KingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Wolf v. Town of LisbonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HinzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.