Legal Opinion
Pizel v. Monaco Coach Corp.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided April 8, 2005No. 3:04CV286CANPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
NUECHTERLEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On October 13, 2004, Defendant filed a motion for partial summary judgment, which this Court granted on February 11, 2005. On February 22, 2005, the Indiana Supreme Court decided the case of Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. Goodin, 822 N.E.2d 947 (Ind.2005), which substantially changed Indiana law regarding the requirement of vertical privity before bringing a claim for breach of an implied warranty. In light of Goodin, on February 23, 2005, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 11, 2005 order. For the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of Waunakee, a Wisconsin Banking Corporation v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Hahn v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. GoodinIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Atkinson v. P & G-Clairol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Castagna v. Newmar Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.