Legal Opinion

Potter v. Scotts Bluff County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1924No. 23923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Defendant appeals- from an allowance, made under the workmen’s compensation law, to plaintiff for injuries received by him while engaged in a road-graveling job for defendant.

Defendant argues that plaintiff at the time he received *319the injuries was not an employee of the county, but was either an independent contractor or an employee of such contractor.

The pertinent facts, as shown by the record, are substantially as follows: Defendant county desired to gravel two and one-half miles of highway east of the village of Minatare, and within the county, and caused a notice to be published that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Davis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Petrow & Giannou v. ShewanNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bodwell v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Showers v. LundNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cole v. MinnickNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Reeder v. Kimball LaundryNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lowe v. Chicago Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Snodgrass v. City of HoldregeNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API