Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weber Meadow-View Corp. v. Wilde

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1978No. 15183Published

1Dissent

MAUGHAN, Justice:

(dissenting).

Plaintiffs appeal from a district court decision granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We should reverse and grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and specific performance under the contract of sale.

The stipulation of the parties shows plaintiff was the assignee of a “first right of refusal,” or a “preemptive right,” to which the real property owned by defendant Wilde was subject. This court recognized at an early date that a preemptive right is a valuable contract right and since “there is nothing unfair or unjust about such a provision” the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Barling v. HornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Westpark, Inc. v. Seaton Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API