United States v. Pulliam
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
O’HAIR, Judge:
The appellant was tried by special court-martial and found guilty of four specifications of larceny. Appellate defense counsel have prepared three assignments of error; however, only one of these needs to be addressed here, and that one raises the issue of multiplicity with respect to Specifications 2, 3 and 4. Specification 2 alleges the larceny of a credit union automatic teller card, while Specifications 3 and 4 allege larcenies by virtue of the subsequent use of that card on two consecutive days to withdraw a total of $400.00 ($200.00 each time) from the card owner’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. GloverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. JobesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. AbendscheinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. FairleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. FlowerdayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. SchaperUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995