Legal Opinion

United States v. Fairley

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 19, 1988No. ACM S27888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The issue before us is whether the theft of an automatic teller machine (ATM) card and its subsequent use to withdraw money from the owner’s bank account are separate offenses for punishment. Two panels of this court, in reviewing virtually identical facts, have arrived at different conclusions regarding this issue.

In United States v. Pulliam, 17 M.J. 1066 (A.F.C.M.R.1984), a three judge panel viewed the theft of an ATM card “as a preamble to the two ... larcenies.” It considered the offenses, although occurring at different times and places as flowing from “a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. BurneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. JobesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. AbendscheinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. WarnerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. GarnerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. FlowerdayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. RoppoloU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. SchaperUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API