Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1916No. 5657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Pontotoc. County; Robert Wimbish, Special Judge. Action by W. U. Walker against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CAMPBELL, C.

This action was commenced in the county court of Pon-totoc county by W. U. Walker to recover damages from the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company for injuries sustained by him on account of the negligence of said company. The cause was tried to a jury and a verdict returned for the plaintiff, which verdict received the approval of the trial court, and judgment for the plaintiff was entered on the verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $500. The defendant appealed from such judgment, and brings the record here by ease-made, and predicates its right to a reversal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Planters' Cotton & Ginning Co. v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. KerseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Estes v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. King Auto Service v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Darby Petroleum Corp. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Kuykendall v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API