Legal Opinion
Wildwest Institute v. Daniel Ashe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2017No. 14-35431PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Wildwest Institute and the Alliance for the Wild Rockies (collectively, Wildwest) appeal a district court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Secretary of the Department of the Interior (collectively, FWS), and the State of Wyoming, in this suit under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1581-1544. Wildwest challenges FWS’s finding that listing the whitebark pine as a threatened or endangered species is “warranted but precluded.” Wildwest asserts that FWS’s decision was arbitrary and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Eva Moore v. John UrquhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Miranda Wallingford v. Robert BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. ZinkeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2017
- D'Agostino v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Douglas Longhini, et al. v. Station Casinos LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.