Legal Opinion
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Zinke
District Court, D. Montana
Decided August 22, 2017No. CV 16-21-M-DLCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Alliance for the Wild Rockies (“Alliance”) moves for summary judgment arguing that Defendants Secretary Ryan Zinke and Director Daniel Ashe (collectively “Defendants”)1 violated the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) determined that the Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bear was not warranted for listing as an endangered species. Defendants, as well Defendant-Intervenors Bonner County, Idaho, Boundary County, Idaho, and Lincoln County, Montana, oppose Alliance’s motion and have filed cross-motions for summary…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Christopher SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Indigenous Envtl. Network v. U.S. Dep't of StateDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018
- AK v. GARLANDDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. SavageDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.