Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 25, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02141Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DON CLEVELAND et al., Case No.: 19cv2141 JM (JLB) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 14 LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT RESEARCH LTD. et al., 15 WITH PREJUDICE Defendant. 16 17 18 Defendants Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (“Ludwig”), Chi Van Dang, 19 Edward A. McDermott, Jr., and John L. Notter (“Defendants”) move to dismiss portions 20 of the Second Amended Complaint (“the SAC”) (Doc. No. 26) pursuant to Federal Rule of 21 Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.